Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGMX vs RNPFX
FCGMX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FCGMX vs RNPFX
FCGMX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FCGMX (44.2M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FCGMX: RNPFX (1.21) vs FCGMX (0.48). FCGMX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FCGMX (3 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). FCGMX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). FCGMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). FCGMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FCGMX (0) vs RNPFX (250). FCGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.35 vs. RNPFX (7.04).
| FCGMX | RNPFX | FCGMX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.45 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.45 | 300% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.442 | 5.075 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.2M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 1.21 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.35 | 7.04 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 34.96 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 13.76 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 108.85 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers