Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGMX vs RNPFX
FCGMX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FCGMX vs RNPFX
FCGMX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. FCGMX (43.8M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FCGMX: RNPFX (1.18) vs FCGMX (0.48). FCGMX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FCGMX (3 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). FCGMX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). FCGMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). FCGMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FCGMX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. FCGMX (9.14).
| FCGMX | RNPFX | FCGMX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.45 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.45 | 300% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.246 | 4.551 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.8M | 172B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 1.18 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.14 | 10.51 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 40.39 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 14.40 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 122.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement