Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGSX vs GFAFX
FCGSX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FCGSX vs GFAFX
FCGSX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGSX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGSX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FCGSX (24.5B). FCGSX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: FCGSX (0.36) vs GFAFX (0.20). FCGSX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FCGSX (13 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). GFAFX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FCGSX (0.00). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FCGSX (30.00). FCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FCGSX (0) vs GFAFX (250). FCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.15 vs. GFAFX (8.53). FCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 32.41 vs. GFAFX (15.46).
| FCGSX | GFAFX | FCGSX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.734 | 6.330 | 375% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.5B | 361B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.20 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.15 | 8.53 | 494% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.12 | 45.13 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.41 | 15.46 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 190.78 | 113.04 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers