Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGSX vs RGACX
FCGSX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FCGSX vs RGACX
FCGSX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGSX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGSX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FCGSX (24.5B). FCGSX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FCGSX (0.36) vs RGACX (0.00). FCGSX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FCGSX (13 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FCGSX (0.00). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FCGSX (30.00). FCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FCGSX (0) vs RGACX (250). FCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.15 vs. RGACX (7.94). FCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 32.41 vs. RGACX (13.23).
| FCGSX | RGACX | FCGSX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.93 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.93 | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.734 | 6.185 | 384% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.5B | 361B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.15 | 7.94 | 531% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.12 | 43.05 | 209% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.41 | 13.23 | 245% |
| Returns for 10 years | 190.78 | 107.97 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement