Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs JLIIX
FCGTX vs JLIIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. JLIIX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and JLIIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 48.1B vs. JLIIX (941M). JLIIX pays higher dividends than FCGTX: JLIIX (2.14) vs FCGTX (1.44). FCGTX was incepted earlier than JLIIX: FCGTX (8 years) vs JLIIX (14 years). JLIIX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). JLIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). FCGTX (1000000) and JLIIX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.83 vs. JLIIX (8.97). FCGTX return over 5 years is better than : 43.68 vs. JLIIX (15.59).
| FCGTX | JLIIX | FCGTX / JLIIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.58 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.90 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.459 | 8.452 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.1B | 941M | 5,112% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 2.14 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.83 | 8.97 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.69 | 16.81 | 242% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.68 | 15.59 | 280% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 9.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement