Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs JLIIX
FCGTX vs JLIIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. JLIIX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and JLIIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 49.4B vs. JLIIX (965M). JLIIX pays higher dividends than FCGTX: JLIIX (2.08) vs FCGTX (1.41). FCGTX was incepted earlier than JLIIX: FCGTX (9 years) vs JLIIX (14 years). JLIIX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). JLIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). FCGTX (1000000) and JLIIX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.73 vs. JLIIX (14.47). FCGTX return over 5 years is better than : 45.80 vs. JLIIX (15.98).
| FCGTX | JLIIX | FCGTX / JLIIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.58 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.90 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.152 | 12.441 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.4B | 965M | 5,119% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 2.08 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.73 | 14.47 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.74 | 16.68 | 244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.80 | 15.98 | 287% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 22.60 | - |