Ad is loading...
FCGTX vs JLIIX
FCGTX vs JLIIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. JLIIX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and JLIIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 44.2B vs. JLIIX (890M). JLIIX pays higher dividends than FCGTX: JLIIX (2.33) vs FCGTX (1.59). FCGTX was incepted earlier than JLIIX: FCGTX (8 years) vs JLIIX (14 years). JLIIX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). FCGTX (1000000) and JLIIX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.41 vs. JLIIX (6.42). FCGTX return over 5 years is better than : 45.66 vs. JLIIX (19.20).
| FCGTX | JLIIX | FCGTX / JLIIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.58 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.90 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.515 | 0.380 | 399% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.2B | 890M | 4,966% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 2.33 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.41 | 6.42 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.96 | 5.05 | 514% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.66 | 19.20 | 238% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 0.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers