Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs LNGZX
FCHKX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$49.98
Change-$0.54 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$47.24
Change-$0.34 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.9M
FCHKX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. LNGZX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a Hold and LNGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. LNGZX (50.9M). LNGZX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: LNGZX (0.91) vs FCHKX (0.44). FCHKX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FCHKX (18 years) vs LNGZX (29 years). FCHKX (1.93) is less costly to investors than LNGZX (1.39). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FCHKX (30.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FCHKX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.36 vs. LNGZX (30.57). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : -5.19 vs. LNGZX (-39.52).
| FCHKX | LNGZX | FCHKX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.24 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.39 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.557 | 29.048 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 50.9M | 3,562% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.91 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.36 | 30.57 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.06 | 29.35 | 249% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.19 | -39.52 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.37 | 21.38 | 348% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement