Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs LNGZX
FCHKX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$50.12
Change-$0.45 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$50.26
Change-$0.58 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.56M
FCHKX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. LNGZX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a Buy and LNGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. LNGZX (54.6M). LNGZX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: LNGZX (0.96) vs FCHKX (0.50). FCHKX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FCHKX (17 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). FCHKX (1.93) is less costly to investors than LNGZX (1.39). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FCHKX (30.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FCHKX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.81 vs. FCHKX (30.20). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 10.55 vs. LNGZX (-28.34).
| FCHKX | LNGZX | FCHKX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.24 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.39 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.940 | 36.317 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 54.6M | 2,537% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.96 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.20 | 31.81 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.94 | 36.45 | 225% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.55 | -28.34 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.31 | 47.07 | 211% |