Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs LNGZX
FCHKX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs LNGZX
FCHKX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. LNGZX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a Hold and LNGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 2.67B vs. LNGZX (41.5M). LNGZX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: LNGZX (2.07) vs FCHKX (0.67). FCHKX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FCHKX (18 years) vs LNGZX (29 years). FCHKX (1.92) is less costly to investors than LNGZX (1.49). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FCHKX (34.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FCHKX (250) vs LNGZX (2000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.36 vs. LNGZX (-13.39). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 39.32 vs. LNGZX (-35.10).
| FCHKX | LNGZX | FCHKX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.24 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.49 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.281 | -10.271 | -324% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 41.5M | 6,427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 2.07 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.36 | -13.39 | -331% |
| Returns for 3 years | 132.80 | 20.11 | 660% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.32 | -35.10 | -112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 175.72 | 10.33 | 1,701% |