Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs MCSMX
FCHKX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs MCSMX
FCHKX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. MCSMX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a Hold and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 2.58B vs. MCSMX (81.9M). MCSMX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: MCSMX (1.83) vs FCHKX (0.69). FCHKX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FCHKX (18 years) vs MCSMX (15 years). FCHKX (1.92) is less costly to investors than MCSMX (1.57). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.83 vs. FCHKX (34.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FCHKX (250) vs MCSMX (2500). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.29 vs. MCSMX (31.82). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 49.41 vs. MCSMX (-18.33).
| FCHKX | MCSMX | FCHKX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.40 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.57 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.934 | 29.458 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.58B | 81.9M | 3,149% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.83 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 52.29 | 31.82 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 133.57 | 59.10 | 226% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.41 | -18.33 | -269% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.55 | 86.73 | 206% |