Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs MCSMX
FCHKX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs MCSMX
FCHKX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. MCSMX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a StrongBuy and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 2.78B vs. MCSMX (110M). MCSMX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: MCSMX (1.39) vs FCHKX (0.64). FCHKX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FCHKX (18 years) vs MCSMX (15 years). FCHKX (1.92) is less costly to investors than MCSMX (1.57). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.83 vs. FCHKX (34.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FCHKX (250) vs MCSMX (2500). FCHKX (63.39) and MCSMX (62.06) have marching annual gain over last year. FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 28.90 vs. MCSMX (-20.26).
| FCHKX | MCSMX | FCHKX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.40 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.57 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.383 | 43.094 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.78B | 110M | 2,525% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 1.39 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 63.39 | 62.06 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 114.74 | 69.19 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.90 | -20.26 | -143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 192.48 | 116.60 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement