Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs MMCFX
FCHKX vs MMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs MMCFX
FCHKX vs MMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. MMCFX commentary
Aug 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a Hold and MMCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 2.58B vs. MMCFX (42.4M). FCHKX pays higher dividends than MMCFX: FCHKX (0.69) vs MMCFX (0.33). FCHKX was incepted earlier than MMCFX: FCHKX (18 years) vs MMCFX (32 years). FCHKX (1.92) is less costly to investors than MMCFX (1.46). MMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. FCHKX (34.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMCFX: FCHKX (250) vs MMCFX (2000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.25 vs. MMCFX (2.78). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 41.92 vs. MMCFX (-28.09).
| FCHKX | MMCFX | FCHKX / MMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.14 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.46 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.074 | 2.033 | 1,529% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.58B | 42.4M | 6,083% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.33 | 211% |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.25 | 2.78 | 1,698% |
| Returns for 3 years | 129.25 | 18.74 | 690% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.92 | -28.09 | -149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.19 | -52.94 | -337% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers