Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs NGCAX
FCHKX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs NGCAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$49.98
Change-$0.54 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Columbia Greater China A
Price$42.81
Change-$0.31 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.27M
FCHKX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. NGCAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a Hold and NGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. NGCAX (51.3M). NGCAX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: NGCAX (0.83) vs FCHKX (0.44). FCHKX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FCHKX (18 years) vs NGCAX (29 years). FCHKX (1.93) is less costly to investors than NGCAX (1.64). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FCHKX (30.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FCHKX (0) vs NGCAX (2000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.36 vs. NGCAX (30.01). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : -5.19 vs. NGCAX (-39.47).
| FCHKX | NGCAX | FCHKX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.49 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.64 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.557 | 28.752 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 51.3M | 3,534% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.83 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.36 | 30.01 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.06 | 28.35 | 258% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.19 | -39.47 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.37 | 17.43 | 427% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement