Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs NGCAX
FCHKX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs NGCAX
FCHKX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. NGCAX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a Hold and NGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 2.72B vs. NGCAX (44.8M). NGCAX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: NGCAX (1.96) vs FCHKX (0.65). FCHKX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FCHKX (18 years) vs NGCAX (29 years). FCHKX (1.92) is less costly to investors than NGCAX (1.74). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FCHKX (34.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FCHKX (250) vs NGCAX (2000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 80.92 vs. NGCAX (8.36). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 28.71 vs. NGCAX (-43.14).
| FCHKX | NGCAX | FCHKX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.49 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.74 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.762 | -5.008 | -714% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 44.8M | 6,071% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.96 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 80.92 | 8.36 | 968% |
| Returns for 3 years | 128.07 | 22.96 | 558% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.71 | -43.14 | -67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 216.96 | 27.98 | 776% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement