Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs NGCAX
FCHKX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs NGCAX
FCHKX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. NGCAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a Hold and NGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 2.67B vs. NGCAX (40.8M). NGCAX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: NGCAX (2.04) vs FCHKX (0.67). FCHKX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FCHKX (18 years) vs NGCAX (29 years). FCHKX (1.92) is less costly to investors than NGCAX (1.74). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FCHKX (34.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FCHKX (250) vs NGCAX (2000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.68 vs. NGCAX (-16.61). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 35.66 vs. NGCAX (-37.01).
| FCHKX | NGCAX | FCHKX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.49 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.74 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.785 | -12.064 | -247% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 40.8M | 6,537% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 2.04 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.68 | -16.61 | -227% |
| Returns for 3 years | 124.22 | 15.25 | 814% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.66 | -37.01 | -96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 173.35 | 6.19 | 2,802% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement