Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIAX vs FWWMX
FCIAX vs FWWMX Comparison
Open Charts FCIAX vs FWWMX
FCIAX vs FWWMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. FCIAX (186B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than FCIAX: FWWMX (1.40) vs FCIAX (1.00). FCIAX was incepted earlier than FWWMX: FCIAX (6 years) vs FWWMX (6 years). FCIAX (0.36) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FCIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FCIAX (250) and FWWMX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.64 vs. FWWMX (7.96). FCIAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.32 vs. FWWMX (32.33).
| FCIAX | FWWMX | FCIAX / FWWMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.31 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.31 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.058 | 1.600 | 504% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 186B | 218B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.40 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.64 | 7.96 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.93 | 28.30 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.32 | 32.33 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement