Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIGX vs NRGSX
FCIGX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts FCIGX vs NRGSX
FCIGX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIGX vs. NRGSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIGX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCIGX has more cash in the bank: 8.92B vs. NRGSX (6.95B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than FCIGX: NRGSX (0.44) vs FCIGX (0.00). FCIGX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: FCIGX (22 years) vs NRGSX (14 years). FCIGX (0.92) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). FCIGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). FCIGX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.46 vs. NRGSX (-8.11). FCIGX return over 5 years is better than : 22.70 vs. NRGSX (-23.14).
| FCIGX | NRGSX | FCIGX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.74 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.74 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.087 | 11.425 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.92B | 6.95B | 128% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.46 | -8.11 | -203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.05 | 2.69 | 2,342% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.70 | -23.14 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.41 | 10.53 | 1,077% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers