Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIGX vs WCMLX
FCIGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FCIGX vs WCMLX
FCIGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIGX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCIGX has more cash in the bank: 8.92B vs. WCMLX (47.2M). FCIGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FCIGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FCIGX (22 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FCIGX (0.92). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FCIGX (77.00). FCIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FCIGX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). FCIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.46 vs. WCMLX (2.81). FCIGX return over 5 years is better than : 22.70 vs. WCMLX (-7.51).
| FCIGX | WCMLX | FCIGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.99 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.79 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.087 | 3.852 | 496% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.92B | 47.2M | 18,898% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.46 | 2.81 | 587% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.05 | 23.40 | 269% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.70 | -7.51 | -302% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement