Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIHX vs RERBX
FCIHX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts FCIHX vs RERBX
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl P
Price$17.19
Change-$0.07 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets731.3M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$59.87
Change-$0.25 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.22B
FCIHX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIHX vs. RERBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIHX is a Hold and RERBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. FCIHX (731M). FCIHX pays higher dividends than RERBX: FCIHX (0.64) vs RERBX (0.23). FCIHX was incepted earlier than RERBX: FCIHX (2 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FCIHX (0.89). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIHX (10.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIHX: RERBX (250) vs FCIHX (5000000). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.81 vs. FCIHX (5.20).
| FCIHX | RERBX | FCIHX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.56 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.56 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.980 | 17.738 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 731M | 132B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.23 | 277% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.20 | 11.81 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 28.30 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -0.24 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.20 | 32.10 | 237% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement