Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIHX vs RERBX
FCIHX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts FCIHX vs RERBX
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl P
Price$17.91
Change+$0.15 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets787.39M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$61.75
Change+$0.51 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.77B
FCIHX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIHX vs. RERBX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIHX is a StrongBuy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FCIHX (787M). FCIHX pays higher dividends than RERBX: FCIHX (0.65) vs RERBX (0.24). FCIHX was incepted earlier than RERBX: FCIHX (2 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FCIHX (0.89). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIHX (10.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIHX: RERBX (250) vs FCIHX (5000000). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.29 vs. FCIHX (3.32).
| FCIHX | RERBX | FCIHX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.56 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.56 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.419 | 21.436 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 787M | 139B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.24 | 274% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.32 | 10.29 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 42.45 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 13.50 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.42 | 39.02 | 209% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement