Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIHX vs RERBX
FCIHX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts FCIHX vs RERBX
FCIHX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIHX vs. RERBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIHX is a Hold and RERBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 141B vs. FCIHX (483M). RERBX pays higher dividends than FCIHX: RERBX (2.23) vs FCIHX (0.85). FCIHX was incepted earlier than RERBX: FCIHX (3 years) vs RERBX (24 years). RERBX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FCIHX (0.89). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FCIHX (25.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIHX: RERBX (250) vs FCIHX (5000000). FCIHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.36 vs. RERBX (3.79).
| FCIHX | RERBX | FCIHX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.57 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.57 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.533 | 1.747 | 259% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 483M | 141B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 2.23 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.36 | 3.79 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 12.63 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -10.18 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.55 | 36.66 | 225% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement