Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIHX vs RERBX
FCIHX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts FCIHX vs RERBX
FCIHX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIHX vs. RERBX commentary
Sep 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIHX is a Hold and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FCIHX (448M). RERBX pays higher dividends than FCIHX: RERBX (2.19) vs FCIHX (0.85). FCIHX was incepted earlier than RERBX: FCIHX (3 years) vs RERBX (24 years). RERBX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FCIHX (0.89). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FCIHX (25.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIHX: RERBX (250) vs FCIHX (5000000). FCIHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.92 vs. RERBX (2.89).
| FCIHX | RERBX | FCIHX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.57 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.57 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.015 | 5.930 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 448M | 140B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 2.19 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.92 | 2.89 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.60 | 23.84 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -8.98 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.02 | 38.87 | 206% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers