Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIHX vs RERFX
FCIHX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts FCIHX vs RERFX
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl P
Price$17.10
Change+$0.28 (+1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets833.75M
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$61.38
Change+$0.75 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.4B
FCIHX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIHX vs. RERFX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIHX is a Hold and RERFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. FCIHX (834M). RERFX pays higher dividends than FCIHX: RERFX (0.92) vs FCIHX (0.68). FCIHX was incepted earlier than RERFX: FCIHX (2 years) vs RERFX (23 years). FCIHX (0.89) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). RERFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIHX (10.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIHX: RERFX (250) vs FCIHX (5000000). RERFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.29 vs. FCIHX (5.42).
| FCIHX | RERFX | FCIHX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.52 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.52 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.425 | 14.387 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 834M | 132B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.92 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | 13.29 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 25.32 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 13.24 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.22 | 28.04 | 261% |