Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCISX vs RLBAX
FCISX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FCISX vs RLBAX
FCISX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCISX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCISX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FCISX (79.2B). FCISX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FCISX (4.65) vs RLBAX (1.11). FCISX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FCISX (31 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FCISX (1.11). FCISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCISX: RLBAX (250) vs FCISX (1000). RLBAX (9.52) and FCISX (9.48) have marching annual gain over last year. FCISX (28.65) and RLBAX (27.62) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCISX | RLBAX | FCISX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.32 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.32 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.794 | 7.341 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.2B | 288B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.65 | 1.11 | 418% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.48 | 9.52 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.67 | 34.60 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.65 | 27.62 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.06 | 71.38 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers