Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCISX vs RLBAX
FCISX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FCISX vs RLBAX
FCISX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCISX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCISX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FCISX (79.7B). FCISX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FCISX (4.65) vs RLBAX (1.11). FCISX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FCISX (31 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FCISX (1.11). FCISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCISX: RLBAX (250) vs FCISX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.28 vs. FCISX (10.34). RLBAX (29.89) and FCISX (28.63) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCISX | RLBAX | FCISX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.32 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.32 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.197 | 8.853 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.7B | 288B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.65 | 1.11 | 418% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.34 | 12.28 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.38 | 38.94 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.63 | 29.89 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.44 | 76.13 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement