Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs TOLSX
FCIVX vs TOLSX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs TOLSX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$17.14
Change+$0.06 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets151.82M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure S
Price$16.90
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets895.63M
FCIVX vs TOLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. TOLSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Hold and TOLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLSX has more cash in the bank: 896M vs. FCIVX (152M). FCIVX (2.70) and TOLSX (2.70) have matching dividends . FCIVX was incepted earlier than TOLSX: FCIVX (9 years) vs TOLSX (17 years). TOLSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.78). TOLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIVX (13.00). TOLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: TOLSX (2500) vs FCIVX (10000). TOLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.34 vs. FCIVX (-4.66). TOLSX return over 5 years is better than : 21.80 vs. FCIVX (13.48).
| FCIVX | TOLSX | FCIVX / TOLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.11 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.21 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.627 | 13.688 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152M | 896M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 2.70 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.66 | 3.34 | -140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.62 | 23.53 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.48 | 21.80 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers