Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs TOLSX
FCIVX vs TOLSX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs TOLSX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$16.44
Change-$0.05 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets146.34M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure S
Price$16.33
Change-$0.10 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets883.33M
FCIVX vs TOLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. TOLSX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Buy and TOLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLSX has more cash in the bank: 883M vs. FCIVX (146M). FCIVX pays higher dividends than TOLSX: FCIVX (3.07) vs TOLSX (2.35). FCIVX was incepted earlier than TOLSX: FCIVX (9 years) vs TOLSX (17 years). TOLSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.78). TOLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIVX (19.00). TOLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: TOLSX (2500) vs FCIVX (10000). TOLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.04 vs. FCIVX (-6.82). TOLSX return over 5 years is better than : 17.92 vs. FCIVX (10.43).
| FCIVX | TOLSX | FCIVX / TOLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.11 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.21 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.480 | 9.865 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 146M | 883M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.07 | 2.35 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.82 | 3.04 | -224% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.59 | 2.43 | -66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.43 | 17.92 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers