Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs TOLSX
FCIVX vs TOLSX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs TOLSX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$16.37
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.03M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure S
Price$16.67
Change-$0.06 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets896.52M
FCIVX vs TOLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. TOLSX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a StrongBuy and TOLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLSX has more cash in the bank: 897M vs. FCIVX (92M). FCIVX pays higher dividends than TOLSX: FCIVX (3.00) vs TOLSX (2.10). FCIVX was incepted earlier than TOLSX: FCIVX (9 years) vs TOLSX (17 years). TOLSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.78). TOLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIVX (19.00). TOLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: TOLSX (2500) vs FCIVX (10000). TOLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.78 vs. FCIVX (-1.11). TOLSX return over 5 years is better than : 15.02 vs. FCIVX (6.40).
| FCIVX | TOLSX | FCIVX / TOLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.11 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.21 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.148 | 10.840 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92M | 897M | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.00 | 2.10 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.11 | 12.78 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.99 | -3.96 | 303% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.40 | 15.02 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 38.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement