Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs TOLSX
FCIVX vs TOLSX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs TOLSX
MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$16.83
Change-$0.15 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.09M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure S
Price$16.53
Change-$0.14 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets874.3M
FCIVX vs TOLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. TOLSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Hold and TOLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLSX has more cash in the bank: 874M vs. FCIVX (150M). TOLSX (2.77) and FCIVX (2.71) have matching dividends . FCIVX was incepted earlier than TOLSX: FCIVX (9 years) vs TOLSX (17 years). TOLSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.92). TOLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIVX (13.00). TOLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: TOLSX (2500) vs FCIVX (10000). TOLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.67 vs. FCIVX (-2.77). TOLSX return over 5 years is better than : 14.95 vs. FCIVX (7.94).
| FCIVX | TOLSX | FCIVX / TOLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.11 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.21 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.473 | 12.141 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150M | 874M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 2.77 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.77 | 0.67 | -410% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.21 | 10.90 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.94 | 14.95 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement