Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs TOLZX
FCIVX vs TOLZX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs TOLZX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$16.33
Change-$0.21 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.44M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure R6
Price$16.44
Change-$0.22 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets910.68M
FCIVX vs TOLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. TOLZX commentary
Jul 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Buy and TOLZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLZX has more cash in the bank: 911M vs. FCIVX (86.4M). FCIVX pays higher dividends than TOLZX: FCIVX (3.11) vs TOLZX (2.57). FCIVX was incepted earlier than TOLZX: FCIVX (9 years) vs TOLZX (11 years). TOLZX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.78). TOLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIVX (19.00). TOLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: TOLZX (0) vs FCIVX (10000). TOLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.22 vs. FCIVX (-1.12). TOLZX return over 5 years is better than : 17.07 vs. FCIVX (9.03).
| FCIVX | TOLZX | FCIVX / TOLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.01 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.05 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.839 | 11.564 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 86.4M | 911M | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.11 | 2.57 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.12 | 11.22 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.50 | 1.28 | -510% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.03 | 17.07 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement