Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs TOLZX
FCIVX vs TOLZX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs TOLZX
MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$16.83
Change-$0.15 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.09M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure R6
Price$16.52
Change-$0.15 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets874.3M
FCIVX vs TOLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. TOLZX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Hold and TOLZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLZX has more cash in the bank: 874M vs. FCIVX (150M). TOLZX pays higher dividends than FCIVX: TOLZX (3.04) vs FCIVX (2.71). FCIVX was incepted earlier than TOLZX: FCIVX (9 years) vs TOLZX (11 years). TOLZX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.92). TOLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIVX (13.00). TOLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: TOLZX (0) vs FCIVX (10000). TOLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.91 vs. FCIVX (-2.77). TOLZX return over 5 years is better than : 15.74 vs. FCIVX (7.94).
| FCIVX | TOLZX | FCIVX / TOLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.01 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.05 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.473 | 12.361 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150M | 874M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 3.04 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.77 | 0.91 | -306% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.21 | 11.38 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.94 | 15.74 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement