Ad is loading...
FCIVX vs TOLZX
FCIVX vs TOLZX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs TOLZX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$14.36
Change+$0.10 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets145.18M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure R6
Price$15.40
Change+$0.09 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets821.58M
FCIVX vs TOLZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. TOLZX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Hold and TOLZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLZX has more cash in the bank: 822M vs. FCIVX (145M). FCIVX pays higher dividends than TOLZX: FCIVX (3.25) vs TOLZX (2.51). FCIVX was incepted earlier than TOLZX: FCIVX (9 years) vs TOLZX (10 years). TOLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FCIVX (12.00). TOLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: TOLZX (0) vs FCIVX (10000). TOLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.38 vs. FCIVX (-9.53). TOLZX return over 5 years is better than : -0.03 vs. FCIVX (-14.08).
| FCIVX | TOLZX | FCIVX / TOLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.127 | 1.717 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145M | 822M | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.25 | 2.51 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.53 | 10.38 | -92% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.67 | -5.59 | 352% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.08 | -0.03 | 49,621% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 22.82 | - |