Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs TOLZX
FCIVX vs TOLZX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs TOLZX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$16.82
Change-$0.04 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets149.78M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure R6
Price$16.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets885.5M
FCIVX vs TOLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. TOLZX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Hold and TOLZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLZX has more cash in the bank: 885M vs. FCIVX (150M). TOLZX pays higher dividends than FCIVX: TOLZX (2.97) vs FCIVX (2.70). FCIVX was incepted earlier than TOLZX: FCIVX (9 years) vs TOLZX (11 years). TOLZX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.78). TOLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIVX (13.00). TOLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: TOLZX (0) vs FCIVX (10000). TOLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.64 vs. FCIVX (-4.20). TOLZX return over 5 years is better than : 20.42 vs. FCIVX (11.17).
| FCIVX | TOLZX | FCIVX / TOLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.01 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.05 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.607 | 12.294 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150M | 885M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 2.97 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.20 | 3.64 | -115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.48 | 26.95 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.17 | 20.42 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement