Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs TOLZX
FCIVX vs TOLZX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs TOLZX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$16.69
Change+$0.07 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets146.09M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure R6
Price$16.65
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets885.56M
FCIVX vs TOLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. TOLZX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Buy and TOLZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLZX has more cash in the bank: 886M vs. FCIVX (146M). FCIVX pays higher dividends than TOLZX: FCIVX (3.07) vs TOLZX (2.59). FCIVX was incepted earlier than TOLZX: FCIVX (9 years) vs TOLZX (11 years). TOLZX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.78). TOLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIVX (19.00). TOLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: TOLZX (0) vs FCIVX (10000). TOLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.06 vs. FCIVX (-7.20). TOLZX return over 5 years is better than : 22.28 vs. FCIVX (12.77).
| FCIVX | TOLZX | FCIVX / TOLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.01 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.05 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.414 | 11.564 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 146M | 886M | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.07 | 2.59 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.20 | 4.06 | -177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.73 | 5.76 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.77 | 22.28 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 56.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement