Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs TOLZX
FCIVX vs TOLZX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs TOLZX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$16.43
Change+$0.10 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets87.06M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure R6
Price$16.72
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets923.08M
FCIVX vs TOLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. TOLZX commentary
Jul 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Buy and TOLZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLZX has more cash in the bank: 923M vs. FCIVX (87.1M). FCIVX pays higher dividends than TOLZX: FCIVX (3.11) vs TOLZX (2.57). FCIVX was incepted earlier than TOLZX: FCIVX (9 years) vs TOLZX (11 years). TOLZX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.78). TOLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIVX (19.00). TOLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: TOLZX (0) vs FCIVX (10000). TOLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.65 vs. FCIVX (3.88). TOLZX return over 5 years is better than : 20.94 vs. FCIVX (11.20).
| FCIVX | TOLZX | FCIVX / TOLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.01 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.05 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.330 | 12.033 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 87.1M | 923M | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.11 | 2.57 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.88 | 17.65 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.19 | 6.33 | -82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.20 | 20.94 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers