Ad is loading...
FCJTX vs RBMTX
FCJTX vs RBMTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCJTX vs. RBMTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCJTX is a Hold and RBMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCJTX (24.2B) and RBMTX (24.2B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCJTX pays higher dividends than RBMTX: FCJTX (1.25) vs RBMTX (0.23). FCJTX was incepted earlier than RBMTX: FCJTX (8 years) vs RBMTX (15 years). RBMTX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FCJTX (0.39). FCJTX (5.00) and RBMTX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. RBMTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCJTX: RBMTX (250) vs FCJTX (1000000). FCJTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.16 vs. RBMTX (4.89). FCJTX return over 5 years is better than : 45.34 vs. RBMTX (39.30).
| FCJTX | RBMTX | FCJTX / RBMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.48 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.48 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.031 | -1.422 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 24.2B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.23 | 540% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.16 | 4.89 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.33 | 16.13 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.34 | 39.30 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 56.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...