Ad is loading...
FCJTX vs RBMTX
FCJTX vs RBMTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCJTX vs. RBMTX commentary
Jan 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCJTX is a Hold and RBMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCJTX (24.9B) and RBMTX (24.9B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCJTX pays higher dividends than RBMTX: FCJTX (1.37) vs RBMTX (0.51). FCJTX was incepted earlier than RBMTX: FCJTX (8 years) vs RBMTX (15 years). FCJTX (1.00) and RBMTX (1.00) have comparable annual turnover. RBMTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCJTX: RBMTX (250) vs FCJTX (1000000). FCJTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.55 vs. RBMTX (15.16). FCJTX return over 5 years is better than : 33.23 vs. RBMTX (27.67).
| FCJTX | RBMTX | FCJTX / RBMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.101 | 2.015 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.9B | 24.9B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.51 | 269% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.55 | 15.16 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.37 | 6.42 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.23 | 27.67 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...