Ad is loading...
FCJTX vs RCMTX
FCJTX vs RCMTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCJTX vs. RCMTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCJTX is a Hold and RCMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCJTX (24.1B) and RCMTX (24.1B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCJTX pays higher dividends than RCMTX: FCJTX (1.25) vs RCMTX (0.65). FCJTX was incepted earlier than RCMTX: FCJTX (8 years) vs RCMTX (15 years). RCMTX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FCJTX (0.39). FCJTX (5.00) and RCMTX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. RCMTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCJTX: RCMTX (250) vs FCJTX (1000000). FCJTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.97 vs. RCMTX (5.24). FCJTX return over 5 years is better than : 43.71 vs. RCMTX (40.32).
| FCJTX | RCMTX | FCJTX / RCMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.03 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.03 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.451 | -1.671 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.1B | 24.1B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.65 | 193% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.97 | 5.24 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.82 | 17.11 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.71 | 40.32 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 59.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...