Ad is loading...
FCLCX vs FSRFX
FCLCX vs FSRFX Comparison
Open Charts FCLCX vs FSRFX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials C
Price$37.50
Change+$0.16 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets643.85M
Fidelity Select Transportation
Price$93.13
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets437.83M
FCLCX vs FSRFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLCX vs. FSRFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLCX is a Buy and FSRFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLCX has more cash in the bank: 644M vs. FSRFX (438M). FSRFX pays higher dividends than FCLCX: FSRFX (1.46) vs FCLCX (0.00). FCLCX was incepted earlier than FSRFX: FCLCX (28 years) vs FSRFX (39 years). FCLCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FSRFX (0.69). FCLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSRFX (22.00). FCLCX (0) and FSRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.36 vs. FSRFX (-12.96). FSRFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.95 vs. FCLCX (41.39).
| FCLCX | FSRFX | FCLCX / FSRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.69 | 252% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.69 | 252% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.808 | -10.117 | -28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 644M | 438M | 147% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.36 | -12.96 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.46 | -0.22 | -14,693% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.39 | 49.95 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.83 | 10.56 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...