Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLCX vs FSRFX
FCLCX vs FSRFX Comparison
Open Charts FCLCX vs FSRFX
FCLCX vs FSRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLCX vs. FSRFX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLCX is a Hold and FSRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLCX has more cash in the bank: 2.21B vs. FSRFX (531M). FSRFX pays higher dividends than FCLCX: FSRFX (0.79) vs FCLCX (0.00). FCLCX was incepted earlier than FSRFX: FCLCX (29 years) vs FSRFX (40 years). FCLCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FSRFX (0.68). FSRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FCLCX (29.00). FCLCX (0) and FSRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSRFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.55 vs. FCLCX (18.42). FCLCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.92 vs. FSRFX (23.61).
| FCLCX | FSRFX | FCLCX / FSRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.68 | 256% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.68 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.476 | 11.988 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.21B | 531M | 416% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.79 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.42 | 20.55 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.64 | 20.59 | 304% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.92 | 23.61 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.74 | 68.95 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement