Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLCX vs FSRFX
FCLCX vs FSRFX Comparison
Open Charts FCLCX vs FSRFX
FCLCX vs FSRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLCX vs. FSRFX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLCX is a Hold and FSRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLCX has more cash in the bank: 2.08B vs. FSRFX (512M). FSRFX pays higher dividends than FCLCX: FSRFX (0.82) vs FCLCX (0.00). FCLCX was incepted earlier than FSRFX: FCLCX (29 years) vs FSRFX (40 years). FCLCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FSRFX (0.68). FSRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FCLCX (29.00). FCLCX (0) and FSRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.88 vs. FSRFX (13.40). FCLCX return over 5 years is better than : 25.95 vs. FSRFX (16.77).
| FCLCX | FSRFX | FCLCX / FSRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.68 | 256% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.68 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.417 | 7.904 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 512M | 406% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.82 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.88 | 13.40 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.12 | 25.22 | 234% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.95 | 16.77 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.08 | 61.62 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers