Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLCX vs FSRFX
FCLCX vs FSRFX Comparison
Open Charts FCLCX vs FSRFX
FCLCX vs FSRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLCX vs. FSRFX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLCX is a Buy and FSRFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLCX has more cash in the bank: 2.02B vs. FSRFX (516M). FSRFX pays higher dividends than FCLCX: FSRFX (0.82) vs FCLCX (0.00). FCLCX was incepted earlier than FSRFX: FCLCX (29 years) vs FSRFX (40 years). FCLCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FSRFX (0.68). FSRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FCLCX (29.00). FCLCX (0) and FSRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCLCX (24.69) and FSRFX (24.22) have marching annual gain over last year. FCLCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.46 vs. FSRFX (17.92).
| FCLCX | FSRFX | FCLCX / FSRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.68 | 256% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.68 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.034 | 11.235 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 516M | 391% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.82 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.69 | 24.22 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.19 | 31.98 | 223% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.46 | 17.92 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.75 | 77.69 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers