Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLCX vs RYPAX
FCLCX vs RYPAX Comparison
Open Charts FCLCX vs RYPAX
FCLCX vs RYPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLCX vs. RYPAX commentary
Jun 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLCX is a Hold and RYPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLCX has more cash in the bank: 2.02B vs. RYPAX (6.68M). RYPAX pays higher dividends than FCLCX: RYPAX (0.05) vs FCLCX (0.00). FCLCX was incepted earlier than RYPAX: FCLCX (29 years) vs RYPAX (28 years). FCLCX (1.74) and RYPAX (1.69) have similar cost to investors . RYPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FCLCX (29.00). FCLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYPAX: FCLCX (0) vs RYPAX (2500). FCLCX (24.47) and RYPAX (23.61) have marching annual gain over last year. FCLCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.10 vs. RYPAX (-18.43).
| FCLCX | RYPAX | FCLCX / RYPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.64 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.69 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.715 | 9.883 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 6.68M | 30,206% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.47 | 23.61 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.30 | 28.52 | 257% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.10 | -18.43 | -163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.88 | 52.83 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement