Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLCX vs RYPAX
FCLCX vs RYPAX Comparison
Open Charts FCLCX vs RYPAX
FCLCX vs RYPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLCX vs. RYPAX commentary
Sep 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLCX is a Hold and RYPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLCX has more cash in the bank: 2.08B vs. RYPAX (5.84M). RYPAX pays higher dividends than FCLCX: RYPAX (0.05) vs FCLCX (0.00). FCLCX was incepted earlier than RYPAX: FCLCX (29 years) vs RYPAX (28 years). FCLCX (1.74) and RYPAX (1.68) have similar cost to investors . RYPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. FCLCX (29.00). FCLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYPAX: FCLCX (0) vs RYPAX (2500). FCLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.88 vs. RYPAX (9.40). FCLCX return over 5 years is better than : 25.95 vs. RYPAX (-16.62).
| FCLCX | RYPAX | FCLCX / RYPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.63 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.68 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.417 | 4.914 | 273% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 5.84M | 35,598% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.88 | 9.40 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.12 | 19.32 | 306% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.95 | -16.62 | -156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.08 | 41.98 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers