Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLCX vs TRGAX
FCLCX vs TRGAX Comparison
Open Charts FCLCX vs TRGAX
FCLCX vs TRGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLCX vs. TRGAX commentary
Aug 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLCX is a Hold and TRGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLCX has more cash in the bank: 2.16B vs. TRGAX (166M). TRGAX pays higher dividends than FCLCX: TRGAX (0.46) vs FCLCX (0.00). FCLCX was incepted earlier than TRGAX: FCLCX (29 years) vs TRGAX (9 years). FCLCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than TRGAX (0.94). TRGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.50 vs. FCLCX (29.00). FCLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRGAX: FCLCX (0) vs TRGAX (500000). FCLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.71 vs. TRGAX (16.23). TRGAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.93 vs. FCLCX (35.40).
| FCLCX | TRGAX | FCLCX / TRGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.73 | 238% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.94 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.752 | 15.801 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.16B | 166M | 1,302% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.71 | 16.23 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.85 | 55.46 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.40 | 44.93 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement