Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLCX vs TRGAX
FCLCX vs TRGAX Comparison
Open Charts FCLCX vs TRGAX
FCLCX vs TRGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLCX vs. TRGAX commentary
Jul 08, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLCX is a Hold and TRGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLCX has more cash in the bank: 2.21B vs. TRGAX (187M). TRGAX pays higher dividends than FCLCX: TRGAX (0.43) vs FCLCX (0.00). FCLCX was incepted earlier than TRGAX: FCLCX (29 years) vs TRGAX (9 years). FCLCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than TRGAX (0.94). TRGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.50 vs. FCLCX (29.00). FCLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRGAX: FCLCX (0) vs TRGAX (500000). FCLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.49 vs. TRGAX (24.37). TRGAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.70 vs. FCLCX (41.27).
| FCLCX | TRGAX | FCLCX / TRGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.73 | 238% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.94 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.255 | 19.424 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.21B | 187M | 1,180% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.49 | 24.37 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.13 | 54.54 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.27 | 49.70 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers