Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLCX vs TRGAX
FCLCX vs TRGAX Comparison
Open Charts FCLCX vs TRGAX
FCLCX vs TRGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLCX vs. TRGAX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLCX is a Hold and TRGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLCX has more cash in the bank: 2.08B vs. TRGAX (164M). TRGAX pays higher dividends than FCLCX: TRGAX (0.45) vs FCLCX (0.00). FCLCX was incepted earlier than TRGAX: FCLCX (29 years) vs TRGAX (9 years). FCLCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than TRGAX (0.94). TRGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.50 vs. FCLCX (29.00). FCLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRGAX: FCLCX (0) vs TRGAX (500000). FCLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.88 vs. TRGAX (13.30). TRGAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.62 vs. FCLCX (25.95).
| FCLCX | TRGAX | FCLCX / TRGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.73 | 238% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.94 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.417 | 13.226 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 164M | 1,268% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.88 | 13.30 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.12 | 50.19 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.95 | 37.62 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers