Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLSX vs RBKTX
FCLSX vs RBKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLSX vs. RBKTX commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLSX is a Hold and RBKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBKTX has more cash in the bank: 46.7B vs. FCLSX (69.1M). FCLSX pays higher dividends than RBKTX: FCLSX (2.13) vs RBKTX (0.55). FCLSX was incepted earlier than RBKTX: FCLSX (8 years) vs RBKTX (18 years). RBKTX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FCLSX (0.00). FCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RBKTX (6.00). FCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBKTX: FCLSX (0) vs RBKTX (250). RBKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.35 vs. FCLSX (6.96). FCLSX return over 5 years is better than : 50.61 vs. RBKTX (39.01).
| FCLSX | RBKTX | FCLSX / RBKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.45 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.45 | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.221 | 5.998 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.1M | 46.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 0.55 | 384% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | 8.35 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.52 | 30.05 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.61 | 39.01 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers