Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLSX vs RBKTX
FCLSX vs RBKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLSX vs. RBKTX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLSX is a Hold and RBKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBKTX has more cash in the bank: 48.1B vs. FCLSX (72.8M). FCLSX pays higher dividends than RBKTX: FCLSX (2.04) vs RBKTX (0.53). FCLSX was incepted earlier than RBKTX: FCLSX (8 years) vs RBKTX (18 years). RBKTX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FCLSX (0.00). FCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RBKTX (6.00). FCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBKTX: FCLSX (0) vs RBKTX (250). RBKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.58 vs. FCLSX (7.83). FCLSX return over 5 years is better than : 49.18 vs. RBKTX (37.86).
| FCLSX | RBKTX | FCLSX / RBKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.45 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.45 | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.241 | 9.778 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.8M | 48.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.04 | 0.53 | 385% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.83 | 9.58 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.08 | 37.12 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.18 | 37.86 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers