Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLSX vs RBKTX
FCLSX vs RBKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLSX vs. RBKTX commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLSX is a Hold and RBKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBKTX has more cash in the bank: 46.1B vs. FCLSX (69.1M). FCLSX pays higher dividends than RBKTX: FCLSX (2.13) vs RBKTX (0.55). FCLSX was incepted earlier than RBKTX: FCLSX (8 years) vs RBKTX (18 years). RBKTX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FCLSX (0.01). FCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RBKTX (6.00). FCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBKTX: FCLSX (0) vs RBKTX (250). RBKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.13 vs. FCLSX (7.57). FCLSX return over 5 years is better than : 47.93 vs. RBKTX (37.30).
| FCLSX | RBKTX | FCLSX / RBKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.45 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.45 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.827 | 5.645 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.1M | 46.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 0.55 | 384% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.57 | 10.13 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.33 | 23.09 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.93 | 37.30 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement