Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLTX vs RYCNX
FCLTX vs RYCNX Comparison
Open Charts FCLTX vs RYCNX
FCLTX vs RYCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLTX vs. RYCNX commentary
Jun 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLTX is a Hold and RYCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLTX has more cash in the bank: 2.02B vs. RYCNX (6.56M). RYCNX pays higher dividends than FCLTX: RYCNX (0.06) vs FCLTX (0.00). FCLTX was incepted earlier than RYCNX: FCLTX (30 years) vs RYCNX (25 years). RYCNX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FCLTX (1.23). RYCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FCLTX (29.00). FCLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCNX: FCLTX (0) vs RYCNX (2500). FCLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.59 vs. RYCNX (21.93). FCLTX return over 5 years is better than : 47.73 vs. RYCNX (-24.41).
| FCLTX | RYCNX | FCLTX / RYCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 2.38 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 2.43 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.324 | 8.037 | 253% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 6.56M | 30,792% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.59 | 21.93 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.42 | 21.06 | 406% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.73 | -24.41 | -196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.99 | 41.97 | 226% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement