Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLTX vs RYPAX
FCLTX vs RYPAX Comparison
Open Charts FCLTX vs RYPAX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials M
Price$52.16
Change-$0.61 (-1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets806.13M
FCLTX vs RYPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLTX vs. RYPAX commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLTX is a Buy and RYPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLTX has more cash in the bank: 806M vs. RYPAX (6.1M). RYPAX pays higher dividends than FCLTX: RYPAX (0.54) vs FCLTX (0.00). FCLTX was incepted earlier than RYPAX: FCLTX (29 years) vs RYPAX (27 years). RYPAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FCLTX (1.23). RYPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FCLTX (29.00). FCLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYPAX: FCLTX (0) vs RYPAX (2500). FCLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.69 vs. RYPAX (13.30). FCLTX return over 5 years is better than : 45.74 vs. RYPAX (0.09).
| FCLTX | RYPAX | FCLTX / RYPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.64 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.69 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.880 | 3.277 | 607% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 806M | 6.1M | 13,213% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.54 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.69 | 13.30 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.69 | -1.61 | -3,842% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.74 | 0.09 | 49,014% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.61 | 32.77 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement