Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLZX vs NPFCX
FCLZX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FCLZX vs NPFCX
FCLZX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. FCLZX (58M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than FCLZX: NPFCX (0.33) vs FCLZX (0.00). FCLZX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: FCLZX (5 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than FCLZX (1.09). FCLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). FCLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: FCLZX (0) vs NPFCX (250). FCLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.95 vs. NPFCX (8.97). FCLZX return over 5 years is better than : 72.36 vs. NPFCX (8.19).
| FCLZX | NPFCX | FCLZX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.47 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.47 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.754 | 4.060 | 388% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58M | 172B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.95 | 8.97 | 445% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.77 | 34.83 | 255% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.36 | 8.19 | 883% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 107.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement