Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLZX vs NPFCX
FCLZX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FCLZX vs NPFCX
FCLZX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FCLZX (59.3M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than FCLZX: NPFCX (0.33) vs FCLZX (0.00). FCLZX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: FCLZX (5 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than FCLZX (1.09). FCLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). FCLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: FCLZX (0) vs NPFCX (250). FCLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.07 vs. NPFCX (6.26). FCLZX return over 5 years is better than : 66.83 vs. NPFCX (8.52).
| FCLZX | NPFCX | FCLZX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.47 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.47 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.818 | 4.931 | 280% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59.3M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.07 | 6.26 | 512% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.87 | 30.32 | 257% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.83 | 8.52 | 785% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement