Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLZX vs RNPFX
FCLZX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FCLZX vs RNPFX
FCLZX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FCLZX (59.3M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FCLZX: RNPFX (1.19) vs FCLZX (0.00). FCLZX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FCLZX (5 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). FCLZX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). FCLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). FCLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FCLZX (0) vs RNPFX (250). FCLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.07 vs. RNPFX (7.77). FCLZX return over 5 years is better than : 66.83 vs. RNPFX (14.74).
| FCLZX | RNPFX | FCLZX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.45 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.45 | 242% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.818 | 5.472 | 253% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59.3M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.19 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.07 | 7.77 | 413% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.87 | 35.68 | 218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.83 | 14.74 | 453% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 111.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers