Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCMAX vs FCMKX
FCMAX vs FCMKX Comparison
Open Charts FCMAX vs FCMKX
FCMAX vs FCMKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCMAX vs. FCMKX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCMAX is a Hold and FCMKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCMAX (1.87B) and FCMKX (1.87B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCMAX pays higher dividends than FCMKX: FCMAX (2.70) vs FCMKX (1.98). FCMAX was incepted earlier than FCMKX: FCMAX (24 years) vs FCMKX (24 years). FCMKX (1.49) is less costly to investors than FCMAX (0.76). FCMAX (19.00) and FCMKX (19.00) have comparable annual turnover. FCMAX (0) and FCMKX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.56 vs. FCMKX (5.79). FCMAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.99 vs. FCMKX (-0.74).
| FCMAX | FCMKX | FCMAX / FCMKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.49 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.49 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.962 | 0.656 | 147% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 1.87B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 1.98 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.56 | 5.79 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.66 | 9.25 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.99 | -0.74 | -403% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.00 | 8.67 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement