Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCMAX vs MSCCX
FCMAX vs MSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FCMAX vs MSCCX
FCMAX vs MSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCMAX vs. MSCCX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCMAX is a Hold and MSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.84B vs. MSCCX (1.28B). MSCCX pays higher dividends than FCMAX: MSCCX (3.08) vs FCMAX (2.79). FCMAX was incepted earlier than MSCCX: FCMAX (24 years) vs MSCCX (14 years). MSCCX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FCMAX (0.76). MSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FCMAX (19.00). FCMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSCCX: FCMAX (0) vs MSCCX (2500). MSCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.63 vs. FCMAX (2.78). FCMAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.78 vs. MSCCX (-1.66).
| FCMAX | MSCCX | FCMAX / MSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.03 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.04 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.105 | -0.395 | 280% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.84B | 1.28B | 144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 3.08 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.78 | 3.63 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.72 | 9.00 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.78 | -1.66 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.73 | 12.68 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement