Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCMAX vs MSCCX
FCMAX vs MSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FCMAX vs MSCCX
FCMAX vs MSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCMAX vs. MSCCX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCMAX is a Hold and MSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.87B vs. MSCCX (1.32B). MSCCX pays higher dividends than FCMAX: MSCCX (3.03) vs FCMAX (2.70). FCMAX was incepted earlier than MSCCX: FCMAX (24 years) vs MSCCX (13 years). MSCCX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FCMAX (0.76). MSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FCMAX (19.00). FCMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSCCX: FCMAX (0) vs MSCCX (2500). FCMAX (6.56) and MSCCX (6.31) have marching annual gain over last year. FCMAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.99 vs. MSCCX (0.17).
| FCMAX | MSCCX | FCMAX / MSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.03 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.04 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.962 | 1.466 | 66% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 1.32B | 142% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 3.03 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.56 | 6.31 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.66 | 10.67 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.99 | 0.17 | 1,748% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.00 | 15.77 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers