Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCMAX vs MSCVX
FCMAX vs MSCVX Comparison
Open Charts FCMAX vs MSCVX
FCMAX vs MSCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCMAX vs. MSCVX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCMAX is a Hold and MSCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.87B vs. MSCVX (1.32B). MSCVX pays higher dividends than FCMAX: MSCVX (3.28) vs FCMAX (2.70). FCMAX was incepted earlier than MSCVX: FCMAX (24 years) vs MSCVX (13 years). MSCVX (0.79) and FCMAX (0.76) have similar cost to investors . MSCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FCMAX (19.00). FCMAX initial investment is less costly to investors than MSCVX (3%) vs MSCVX (3%). FCMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSCVX: FCMAX (0) vs MSCVX (2500). MSCVX (6.58) and FCMAX (6.56) have marching annual gain over last year. FCMAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.99 vs. MSCVX (1.44).
| FCMAX | MSCVX | FCMAX / MSCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.78 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.79 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.962 | 1.572 | 61% |
| Front Load | 4% | 3% | 160% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 1.32B | 142% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 3.28 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.56 | 6.58 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.66 | 11.51 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.99 | 1.44 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.00 | 18.53 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers