Ad is loading...
FCNAX vs FSCPX
FCNAX vs FSCPX Comparison
Open Charts FCNAX vs FSCPX
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Discret A
Price$41.12
Change+$0.42 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets444.94M
Fidelity Select Consumer Discret Port
Price$58.76
Change+$0.61 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets448.31M
FCNAX vs FSCPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNAX vs. FSCPX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNAX is a Buy and FSCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCPX (448M) and FCNAX (445M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FSCPX pays higher dividends than FCNAX: FSCPX (0.07) vs FCNAX (0.00). FCNAX was incepted earlier than FSCPX: FCNAX (29 years) vs FSCPX (35 years). FCNAX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FSCPX (0.70). FSCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCNAX (25.00). FCNAX (0) and FSCPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCNAX (500) and FSCPX (500) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. FCNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.12 vs. FSCPX (-3.38). FCNAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.61 vs. FSCPX (25.54).
| FCNAX | FSCPX | FCNAX / FSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.70 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.70 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.716 | -14.636 | 94% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 500 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 445M | 448M | 99% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.12 | -3.38 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.32 | 19.56 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.61 | 25.54 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.76 | 68.71 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers