Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNKX vs RGACX
FCNKX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FCNKX vs RGACX
Fidelity Contrafund K
Price$24.13
Change-$0.21 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.17B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.69
Change-$0.58 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
FCNKX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNKX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNKX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. FCNKX (176B). FCNKX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FCNKX (0.10) vs RGACX (0.07). FCNKX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FCNKX (18 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FCNKX (0.56). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FCNKX (18.00). FCNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FCNKX (0) vs RGACX (250). FCNKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.70 vs. RGACX (6.60). FCNKX return over 5 years is better than : 42.58 vs. RGACX (30.90).
| FCNKX | RGACX | FCNKX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.94 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.94 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.355 | 14.863 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 176B | 330B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.07 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.70 | 6.60 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.62 | 60.28 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.58 | 30.90 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.04 | 84.84 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement