Ad is loading...
FCNKX vs RGACX
FCNKX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FCNKX vs RGACX
Fidelity Contrafund K
Price$20.37
Change+$0.13 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets144.96B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$68.46
Change+$0.70 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.25B
FCNKX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNKX vs. RGACX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNKX is a Hold and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 275B vs. FCNKX (145B). FCNKX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FCNKX (0.12) vs RGACX (0.09). FCNKX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FCNKX (17 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FCNKX (0.56). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FCNKX (18.00). FCNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FCNKX (0) vs RGACX (250). FCNKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.81 vs. RGACX (0.34). FCNKX return over 5 years is better than : 81.78 vs. RGACX (68.49).
| FCNKX | RGACX | FCNKX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.94 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.94 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.076 | -4.903 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145B | 275B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.09 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.81 | 0.34 | 1,997% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.09 | 5.90 | 374% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.78 | 68.49 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.06 | 58.32 | 178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...