Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNKX vs RGACX
FCNKX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FCNKX vs RGACX
FCNKX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNKX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNKX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FCNKX (180B). FCNKX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FCNKX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FCNKX (18 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FCNKX (0.67). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FCNKX (29.00). FCNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FCNKX (0) vs RGACX (250). FCNKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.48 vs. RGACX (3.68). FCNKX return over 5 years is better than : 42.81 vs. RGACX (13.46).
| FCNKX | RGACX | FCNKX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.93 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.93 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.610 | 6.959 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 180B | 357B | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.48 | 3.68 | 421% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.25 | 37.13 | 211% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.81 | 13.46 | 318% |
| Returns for 10 years | 173.88 | 97.58 | 178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement