Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNKX vs RGAEX
FCNKX vs RGAEX Comparison
Open Charts FCNKX vs RGAEX
FCNKX vs RGAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNKX vs. RGAEX commentary
Jul 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNKX is a Buy and RGAEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FCNKX (180B). RGAEX pays higher dividends than FCNKX: RGAEX (0.21) vs FCNKX (0.00). FCNKX was incepted earlier than RGAEX: FCNKX (18 years) vs RGAEX (24 years). FCNKX (0.67) is less costly to investors than RGAEX (0.63). RGAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FCNKX (29.00). FCNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAEX: FCNKX (0) vs RGAEX (250). FCNKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.48 vs. RGAEX (4.23). FCNKX return over 5 years is better than : 42.81 vs. RGAEX (15.67).
| FCNKX | RGAEX | FCNKX / RGAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.63 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.63 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.610 | 7.135 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 180B | 357B | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.48 | 4.23 | 366% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.25 | 39.08 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.81 | 15.67 | 273% |
| Returns for 10 years | 173.88 | 102.11 | 170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement