Ad is loading...
FCNKX vs RGAFX
FCNKX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FCNKX vs RGAFX
Fidelity Contrafund K
Price$20.00
Change-$0.62 (-3.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets157.54B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$69.68
Change-$2.59 (-3.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.57B
FCNKX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNKX vs. RGAFX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNKX is a Buy and RGAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 287B vs. FCNKX (158B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FCNKX: RGAFX (0.62) vs FCNKX (0.11). FCNKX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FCNKX (17 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). FCNKX (0.56) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FCNKX (18.00). FCNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FCNKX (0) vs RGAFX (250). FCNKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.57 vs. RGAFX (3.54). FCNKX return over 5 years is better than : 59.48 vs. RGAFX (51.06).
| FCNKX | RGAFX | FCNKX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.34 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.34 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.275 | -2.889 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 287B | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.62 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 3.54 | 271% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.73 | 23.15 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.48 | 51.06 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.32 | 69.17 | 159% |