Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNKX vs RGAFX
FCNKX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FCNKX vs RGAFX
FCNKX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNKX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNKX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FCNKX (177B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FCNKX: RGAFX (0.46) vs FCNKX (0.00). FCNKX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FCNKX (18 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). FCNKX (0.67) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FCNKX (29.00). FCNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FCNKX (0) vs RGAFX (250). FCNKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.69 vs. RGAFX (0.42). FCNKX return over 5 years is better than : 37.15 vs. RGAFX (14.74).
| FCNKX | RGAFX | FCNKX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.34 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.34 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.160 | 9.276 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177B | 353B | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.69 | 0.42 | 2,077% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.12 | 44.36 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.15 | 14.74 | 252% |
| Returns for 10 years | 172.93 | 109.80 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers