Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNKX vs RGAFX
FCNKX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FCNKX vs RGAFX
FCNKX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNKX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNKX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FCNKX (180B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FCNKX: RGAFX (0.46) vs FCNKX (0.00). FCNKX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FCNKX (18 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). FCNKX (0.67) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FCNKX (29.00). FCNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FCNKX (0) vs RGAFX (250). FCNKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.48 vs. RGAFX (4.67). FCNKX return over 5 years is better than : 42.81 vs. RGAFX (17.46).
| FCNKX | RGAFX | FCNKX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.34 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.34 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.610 | 7.299 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 180B | 357B | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.48 | 4.67 | 332% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.25 | 40.73 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.81 | 17.46 | 245% |
| Returns for 10 years | 173.88 | 105.95 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement