Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNSX vs FICDX
FCNSX vs FICDX Comparison
Open Charts FCNSX vs FICDX
FCNSX vs FICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNSX vs. FICDX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNSX is a Hold and FICDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNSX has more cash in the bank: 10.2B vs. FICDX (1.14B). FCNSX pays higher dividends than FICDX: FCNSX (1.21) vs FICDX (0.72). FCNSX was incepted earlier than FICDX: FCNSX (9 years) vs FICDX (39 years). FICDX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FCNSX (0.00). FICDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. FCNSX (13.00). FCNSX (0) and FICDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCNSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.06 vs. FICDX (9.12). FCNSX return over 5 years is better than : 66.95 vs. FICDX (34.28).
| FCNSX | FICDX | FCNSX / FICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.84 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.84 | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.772 | 4.515 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.2B | 1.14B | 893% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.72 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.06 | 9.12 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.42 | 38.37 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.95 | 34.28 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 88.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement