Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNSX vs MPACX
FCNSX vs MPACX Comparison
Open Charts FCNSX vs MPACX
FCNSX vs MPACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNSX vs. MPACX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNSX is a Hold and MPACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNSX has more cash in the bank: 9.91B vs. MPACX (315M). FCNSX pays higher dividends than MPACX: FCNSX (1.23) vs MPACX (0.00). FCNSX was incepted earlier than MPACX: FCNSX (9 years) vs MPACX (23 years). MPACX (1.30) is less costly to investors than FCNSX (0.00). MPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.47 vs. FCNSX (13.00). FCNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MPACX: FCNSX (0) vs MPACX (2500). MPACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.34 vs. FCNSX (17.01). FCNSX return over 5 years is better than : 75.01 vs. MPACX (-4.86).
| FCNSX | MPACX | FCNSX / MPACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.30 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.30 | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.063 | 33.481 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.91B | 315M | 3,147% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.01 | 42.34 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.47 | 77.35 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.01 | -4.86 | -1,545% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement