Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNSX vs RLAIX
FCNSX vs RLAIX Comparison
Open Charts FCNSX vs RLAIX
FCNSX vs RLAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNSX vs. RLAIX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNSX is a Buy and RLAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNSX has more cash in the bank: 9.91B vs. RLAIX (453M). RLAIX pays higher dividends than FCNSX: RLAIX (3.50) vs FCNSX (1.23). FCNSX was incepted earlier than RLAIX: FCNSX (9 years) vs RLAIX (9 years). RLAIX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FCNSX (0.00). RLAIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.20 vs. FCNSX (13.00). FCNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLAIX: FCNSX (0) vs RLAIX (500000). RLAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.42 vs. FCNSX (14.92). FCNSX return over 5 years is better than : 69.43 vs. RLAIX (21.15).
| FCNSX | RLAIX | FCNSX / RLAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.08 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.21 | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.886 | 7.576 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.91B | 453M | 2,188% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 3.50 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.92 | 16.42 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.67 | 23.88 | 254% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.43 | 21.15 | 328% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement