Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNTX vs GFACX
FCNTX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts FCNTX vs GFACX
FCNTX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNTX vs. GFACX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNTX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FCNTX (177B). FCNTX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FCNTX was incepted earlier than GFACX: FCNTX (59 years) vs GFACX (26 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FCNTX (0.74). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FCNTX (29.00). FCNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: FCNTX (0) vs GFACX (250). FCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.60 vs. GFACX (-2.39). FCNTX return over 5 years is better than : 36.55 vs. GFACX (3.85).
| FCNTX | GFACX | FCNTX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.35 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.35 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 59 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.123 | 8.529 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177B | 353B | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.60 | -2.39 | -360% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.75 | 34.46 | 217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.55 | 3.85 | 948% |
| Returns for 10 years | 170.91 | 82.33 | 208% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement