Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNTX vs RGAEX
FCNTX vs RGAEX Comparison
Open Charts FCNTX vs RGAEX
FCNTX vs RGAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNTX vs. RGAEX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNTX is a Buy and RGAEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FCNTX (177B). RGAEX pays higher dividends than FCNTX: RGAEX (0.21) vs FCNTX (0.00). FCNTX was incepted earlier than RGAEX: FCNTX (59 years) vs RGAEX (24 years). FCNTX (0.74) is less costly to investors than RGAEX (0.63). RGAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FCNTX (29.00). FCNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAEX: FCNTX (0) vs RGAEX (250). FCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.60 vs. RGAEX (-0.00). FCNTX return over 5 years is better than : 36.55 vs. RGAEX (12.98).
| FCNTX | RGAEX | FCNTX / RGAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.63 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.63 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 59 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.123 | 9.051 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177B | 353B | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.60 | -0.00 | -1,912,949% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.75 | 42.68 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.55 | 12.98 | 282% |
| Returns for 10 years | 170.91 | 105.92 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers