Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNTX vs RGAGX
FCNTX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FCNTX vs RGAGX
FCNTX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNTX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNTX is a Buy and RGAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FCNTX (173B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FCNTX: RGAGX (0.52) vs FCNTX (0.00). FCNTX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FCNTX (59 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FCNTX (0.74) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FCNTX (29.00). FCNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FCNTX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.73 vs. RGAGX (1.96). FCNTX return over 5 years is better than : 36.87 vs. RGAGX (15.08).
| FCNTX | RGAGX | FCNTX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.29 | 255% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.29 | 255% |
| Fund Existence | 59 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.708 | 5.796 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 173B | 357B | 48% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.73 | 1.96 | 395% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.91 | 37.42 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.87 | 15.08 | 245% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.93 | 103.10 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement