Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNTX vs RGAGX
FCNTX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FCNTX vs RGAGX
FCNTX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNTX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNTX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FCNTX (173B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FCNTX: RGAGX (0.52) vs FCNTX (0.00). FCNTX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FCNTX (59 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FCNTX (0.74) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FCNTX (29.00). FCNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FCNTX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. RGAGX (5.99). FCNTX return over 5 years is better than : 38.57 vs. RGAGX (19.07).
| FCNTX | RGAGX | FCNTX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.29 | 255% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.29 | 255% |
| Fund Existence | 59 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.671 | 9.656 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 173B | 342B | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.97 | 5.99 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.55 | 49.02 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.57 | 19.07 | 202% |
| Returns for 10 years | 163.39 | 105.26 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers