Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNTX vs RGEBX
FCNTX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FCNTX vs RGEBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$84.45
Change+$0.59 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.84B
FCNTX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNTX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNTX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. FCNTX (171B). FCNTX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FCNTX (0.05) vs RGEBX (0.00). FCNTX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FCNTX (58 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FCNTX (0.63). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FCNTX (18.00). FCNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FCNTX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.06 vs. RGEBX (16.07). FCNTX return over 5 years is better than : 50.66 vs. RGEBX (42.08).
| FCNTX | RGEBX | FCNTX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.09 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.09 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 58 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.023 | 17.385 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 171B | 338B | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.06 | 16.07 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.41 | 59.47 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.66 | 42.08 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.29 | 94.78 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement