Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNTX vs RGEBX
FCNTX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FCNTX vs RGEBX
FCNTX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNTX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNTX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FCNTX (177B). FCNTX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FCNTX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FCNTX (59 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FCNTX (0.74). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FCNTX (29.00). FCNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FCNTX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.60 vs. RGEBX (-0.77). FCNTX return over 5 years is better than : 36.55 vs. RGEBX (9.71).
| FCNTX | RGEBX | FCNTX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.08 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.08 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 59 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.123 | 8.727 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177B | 353B | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.60 | -0.77 | -1,112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.75 | 39.77 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.55 | 9.71 | 376% |
| Returns for 10 years | 170.91 | 97.58 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement