Compare trend and price FCOM vs IAC
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and IAC is a Hold.
IAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FCOM | IAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 19 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LRGF | 52.55 | 0.76 | +1.47% |
| iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF | |||
| PTEC | 31.14 | 0.44 | +1.43% |
| Global X Prop Tech ETF | |||
| EYLD | 35.05 | 0.22 | +0.62% |
| Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF | |||
| RSPR | 31.65 | 0.19 | +0.61% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Real Estt ETF | |||
| MNBD | 25.58 | 0.05 | +0.21% |
| ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF | |||
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +0.96% | ||
| META - FCOM | 78% Closely correlated | +2.33% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 73% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 73% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| LBRDA - FCOM | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| IAC - FCOM | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.63% | ||
More | ||||
IAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IAC has been closely correlated with ANGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IAC jumps, then ANGI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IAC | 100% | +2.63% | ||
| ANGI - IAC | 72% Closely correlated | +4.10% | ||
| MTCH - IAC | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| ZG - IAC | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.25% | ||
| KIND - IAC | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.92% | ||
| CARG - IAC | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
More | ||||