FCOM vs META ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and META is a Hold.
META | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FCOM | META | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 80% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BRWUX | 21.82 | 0.38 | +1.77% |
| MFS Blended Research Growth Eq R4 | |||
| AGCTX | 18.08 | 0.19 | +1.06% |
| American Century Global Small Cap R6 | |||
| FSWFX | 66.20 | 0.57 | +0.87% |
| American Funds SMALLCAP World 529-F-2 | |||
| PRPDX | 54.28 | 0.31 | +0.57% |
| Permanent Portfolio Permanent A | |||
| FRGOX | 15.88 | -0.09 | -0.56% |
| Franklin Gold and Precious Metals C | |||
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +0.96% | ||
| META - FCOM | 78% Closely correlated | +2.33% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 73% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 73% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| LBRDA - FCOM | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| IAC - FCOM | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.63% | ||
More | ||||
META and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, META has been loosely correlated with GOOGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if META jumps, then GOOGL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To META | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | 100% | +2.33% | ||
| GOOGL - META | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| GOOG - META | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| SMWB - META | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| CARG - META | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| PINS - META | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
More | ||||